“That’s alright I’m used to it.”

Screen capture from the movie "Labrynth" depicting Sarah holding the nose of a living brass doorknocker, with the sound capture [Grunting} showing.
Just accept the status quo.

This scene. I keep coming back to this scene from 1986 “Labyrinth”.
Sarah is racing against the clock. Time is of the essence. She must find her brother. Things are very urgent to her. She comes to a place where her path is blocked by two doors with living knockers. She has to solve a logic puzzle to choose which door to open. That puzzle doesn’t stick with me. What does is how she proceeds.

The knocker she chooses realizes they like their freedom from having to hold and talk around the knocker ring in their mouth. They resist actively having it put back in. The other knocker even comments that they, “Can’t blame ’em.” But Sarah has her quest and chooses to basically suffocate the chosen knocker by holding their nose and forcing the mouth open so she can reinsert the ring. She doesn’t look comfortable doing it, but knows she’s justified. The knocker’s mouth opens. She reinserts the ring and knocks.

The door opens and Sarah scoots past with a quick, “Sorry.” Which the knocker then replies, “That’s alright I’m used to it. ” Sarah resumes her quest and the movie moves on.

My thoughts stay though. How many, many places in my life do I settle into, “That’s ok, I’m used to it?” Is it ok though? Am I signing up/volunteering/stepping up to/fixing things, just because I always have? Or because I should somehow? Do I really have to settle this way? Do I want to?

Now often when I feel myself sigh with frustration at being stuck in a task I do not enjoy, thinking the whole time, I’m the one who does this. The line from the movie floats through my head, “That’s alright I’m used to it.” and I realize it’s not. It wasn’t right for the knocker and it’s not right for me.

So I start digging, asking myself questions, as I do. What isn’t working? Why do I do this at all? Do I have to be the one to do it? Why? Usually somewhere in this questioning I find that I just fell into a routine and did it unthinkingly and that became a standard, both for me and others around me.

I am thinking of this in terms of household and work tasks. They tend to fall on certain people. Asking for a change is brave. It is not easy to do, because it’s never just about the task. It’s about the relationship. Will this change how I’m seen in ways I can’t control. Right now I’m seen as the person who happily (or begrudgingly) does this particular thing. What will fill this void? How will this change affect my reputation as a worker or partner. I think this is really where the fear lies, not in the delegation of the tasks, but the possible damage to the relationship.

If I try to change this will I be seen as disagreeable? lazy? selfish? Sometimes. But this is probably a red flag in that relationship. Even if that is the case I know it’s better to work on changing things because it is no longer working out for me. I am the only one who can assess my needs and feelings, I have to advocate for myself.

When I do advocate for myself I get three typical responses, immediate acceptance and action, disinterest/brush off, or immediate rejection. Sometimes these are knee-jerk reactions, but even those fall pretty much in these categories. All of these options are better than saying or risking nothing. Why? Because I no longer accept suffering in silence. If they accept the change, yay! If they do nothing, or reject, they cannot do either of those things without knowledge it was brought to their attention. Self advocation brings awareness of your situation into the shared reality. Even if nothing else changes, that did. Now if the status quo does not change and still causes me suffering, I am not suffering because I didn’t say anything, I am suffering because something else needs to change.

With this knowledge I make much better informed choices. I can choose to settle back into what I’m used to, even though it’s not working for me. I can try again for change within the relationship, or I can leave the relationship. Each of these options has innumerable variants. I can start working on easing my suffering one way or another. Advocacy is empowerment. Once I state my grievance or concern and I get the reaction I get, these things are no longer guesswork. I don’t have to guess how the reaction to the proposal will be, I know. I can look for patterns and choose what I want for me.

Unfortunately most of the times I have had to do this, I also had to end the relationship. The status quo was valued more than I was. The thing is, that was true before I tested it. That’s why I was afraid in the first place. Testing it did not create that dynamic, it proved it. Once I prove something like that to myself I can’t go back to being so unvalued, while consciously aware that I’m unvalued. I might be used to it, but that doesn’t make it alright.

The Yoke

The yoke stands wide and menacingly inviting.

All my cares will handled if I just agree to pull the master’s cart.

Don’t I deserve the stability that provides?

I only have to do it during the day, and on market day.

I get days off.

But if I accept I only get fed if I obey

My potential value is so much more than my constrained task sheet

Am I allowed to sing while I work?

What happens to the ideas that I find while my body is busy?
What if I see a better path,

Want to move faster than the master does?

Heaven forbid I need to move slower. Will I be run over? Abandoned?

Will I know where I am when that happens? How will I get home?

That is the deal.

The master chooses the pace.

The master chooses the direction.

The master owns the ideas

The master voices the songs, we echo the songs.

The master does not own you!

What a silly idea.

The master owns the yoke.

You can take it off at any time.

The master can deny you the right to wear it at any time.

Why do you think you are not free?

Sauce Saturday: Domestic Blisters/Struggle Care

So I spend way too much of my time on TikTok, and one of the gems I have found is a creator called Domesic Blisters. She (KC Davis) also has a book and website, but I haven’t read the book.

Davis really gets nitty gritty about how to let yourself be not ok and still take care of yourself, your space and your family. Starting with the thing that got me hooked: “Care tasks are morally neutral, they are functional not moral”. While I was already on a path that was leading me to this very conclusion, those specific words have been a game changer.

The idea that your struggle does not make you a bad person, and that evidence of your struggle doesn’t either, is a wonderful weapon I use to fight shame messages in my thinking. If my house is messy but I can still find the things I need, then it is functional, there is no need for blame or shame around the mess.

By removing the layer of judgement inherit in seeing daily care tasks as moral rather than just functional, Davis, creates mental space to really look at enhancing functionality, and embracing individual strategies for arranging your life and space. She shows her audience the ways she does things that work for her and her particular struggles. She encourages us all to find the strategies that work with our personal tendencies and the life you have right now.

This ends up looking like storing things where they tend to end up anyway, or having collection baskets in those places. Even bagging up garbage to throw in the garbage if you can’t get to it right away or throwing away the dishes if necessary!! Your house, routines and stuff should serve you and support you and your life not the other way around.

If you like me sometimes have emotional reactions to daily care tasks, I absolutely encourage you to check out Domestic Blisters. If only to see how easily and thoughtfully she handles trolls. 🙂